Updated July 21, 2026 · 2026-07-21-v43.0

Accessibility Statement

MyLegalDocs AI is intended to let people explain a document need, upload materials, review a price, pay, download files and request a same-scope revision without unnecessary barriers. Accessibility is treated as an ongoing product and support obligation, not as a one-time badge.

No certification claim: this Statement does not claim that every page, uploaded scan, generated file or third-party service currently conforms to every WCAG success criterion. The service uses WCAG as technical guidance, tests critical workflows and documents known limitations.

Operate

Core controls are intended to work without drag-and-drop and without requiring a mouse.

Understand

Labels, headings, status messages and error explanations supplement visual styling and color.

Adapt

Responsive layouts, zoom support and an alternative support path address different access needs.

1. Commitment and scope

This Statement covers the public website, intake, free identification, analysis result, checkout handoff, secure order page, download and revision interfaces that MyLegalDocs AI directly controls. It also explains the limits affecting user uploads, mandatory government forms, generated DOCX/PDF files and third-party payment or linked websites.

The goal is effective access to the same core information and service, while recognizing that an individualized accommodation may be necessary where a technical barrier cannot be corrected immediately.

2. Legal and technical framework

The U.S. Department of Justice states that businesses open to the public must provide people with disabilities equal access to the goods and services they offer and communicate effectively where the Americans with Disabilities Act applies. DOJ web guidance identifies keyboard access, headings, sufficient contrast, zoom, text alternatives, error explanation, manual testing and a barrier-reporting path as relevant practices. DOJ Guidance on Web Accessibility and the ADA ↗

For private businesses, DOJ's Title III guidance describes general nondiscrimination, effective-communication and reasonable-modification duties but does not impose the federal-agency Section 508 standard on every private website. ADA Title III business guidance ↗

Section 508 applies to information and communication technology developed, procured, maintained or used by federal agencies. Its standards can provide useful technical guidance, but MyLegalDocs AI does not claim that Section 508 directly governs this private service merely because it links to federal courts or agencies. U.S. Access Board ICT and Section 508 Standards ↗

WCAG is used as a technical reference. It does not replace the controlling legal analysis and this Statement is not a certification. W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2 ↗

3. Measures used in the service

StructurePage landmarks, ordered headings, labels, descriptive links, lists and text status messages are used to help assistive technology interpret the workflow.
InputStandard form controls remain available. Upload does not depend exclusively on drag-and-drop. Buttons and disclosures are intended to be keyboard operable.
Visual presentationResponsive layouts, browser zoom, visible focus treatment, text in addition to color and contrast-aware foreground/background combinations are part of the design system.
MotionReduced-motion preferences are respected where supported, and essential information should not depend on animation.
Errors and statusRequired fields, validation failures, payment states, generation progress and delivery status use text explanations rather than color alone.
Private workflowAnalysis, order, revision and download pages use noindex controls to reduce unintended search exposure; this privacy control does not replace accessibility.

4. Keyboard navigation and visible focus

Users should be able to reach navigation, form fields, upload controls, disclosures, consent controls, buttons and links with standard keyboard commands. Focus should move in a logical order and remain visible. No core transaction should require a precision pointer gesture or drag-and-drop operation.

If focus is lost, trapped or obscured, report the page, control and browser. Include the keyboard command used and whether a screen reader was active.

5. Screen readers, labels and page structure

Controls are intended to have programmatic labels, and visual headings are intended to correspond to semantic heading structure. Progress states and important instructions should be available as text. Decorative imagery should not carry essential information.

Automatically extracted text from an uploaded scan may contain recognition errors. A screen reader's ability to read a user-supplied image or third-party PDF depends on the accessibility of that source file.

6. Vision, text resizing, zoom and color

The layout is designed to reflow at common mobile widths and browser zoom levels without making horizontal scrolling necessary for ordinary text content. Information should not be conveyed by color alone, and focus, required-field and error states should include text or shape cues.

Very large zoom, browser reader modes, user stylesheets and operating-system contrast settings can expose defects in complex layouts. A user who encounters clipped text or an unreachable control should request a correction or alternative.

7. Motion, timing and cognitive accessibility

Animations are decorative or explanatory and should not be necessary to understand or complete the transaction. Reduced-motion preferences are used where supported. The service avoids automatic recurring charges and attempts to explain each stage in plain language.

Security and payment sessions may expire. If a disability-related barrier prevents completion within a session, contact support for a reasonable alternative. A legal or court deadline is not extended by a website accommodation request.

8. Forms, instructions and error handling

Form fields should include visible instructions and machine-readable labels. Errors should identify the affected field and explain how to correct it. A user should not have to infer an error from red color alone.

The platform may reject unsupported files, excessive sizes, invalid email addresses, missing consent or unlawful service requests. These messages are part of the functional workflow and should remain understandable to assistive technology.

9. Uploads, downloads and generated documents

Uploaded scans, photographs and third-party documents may lack text layers, reading order, alternative text, tagged headings, form labels or accessible tables. OCR can improve extraction but does not make a source file fully accessible.

Generated DOCX and PDF files are prepared for editing and printing, but complex exhibits, tables, signatures, converted court forms or source images may require remediation for a particular assistive technology. A user may request a text-forward alternative or correction to a generated file where reasonably possible within the purchased scope.

10. Third-party services and official resources

Stripe payment pages, email clients, linked court or agency websites, official forms, browser translation, reader modes and downloaded office/PDF software are controlled by third parties. MyLegalDocs AI cannot alter those interfaces directly.

A third-party limitation does not end the support inquiry. The service will identify the responsible interface and, where reasonably possible, offer an alternative route for the part it controls. It cannot change a mandatory government filing method or act as the government entity.

11. Known limitations

  • Scanned or image-only uploads may be unreadable or incorrectly recognized.
  • Mandatory court and agency PDFs may have inaccessible fields or reading order.
  • Generated files containing complex tables, exhibits or converted source images may need additional remediation.
  • Browser translation and Reader View can change navigation, labels or layout.
  • Third-party payment, email and government sites can contain barriers outside the platform's control.
  • Automated accessibility tools cannot detect every barrier; a clean scan is not proof of full accessibility.

12. Reasonable accessible alternative

Where a confirmed platform barrier prevents use of the website or delivery process, the user may request a reasonable accessible alternative for the same core service. Depending on the barrier and security requirements, that may include a text-forward explanation, accessible copy of instructions, restored secure link, alternate file format, corrected generated file, or guided completion of the technical workflow.

Support cannot provide legal advice, choose legal strategy, sign or file for the user, bypass identity/payment security, or change a court or agency's mandatory method. An alternative may require verification of the order and a safe method of receiving files.

13. How to report a barrier

Email contact@mylegaldocsai.com with the subject “Accessibility Barrier.” Include:

  • the page or workflow step;
  • the task you were trying to complete;
  • device, operating system and browser;
  • assistive technology and version, where relevant;
  • keyboard or gesture used;
  • a concise description of the barrier and preferred contact method.

Do not send payment credentials or unnecessary case facts. Use an order identifier instead of attaching legal documents unless a secure method is requested.

14. Response and remediation process

A report is reviewed to determine whether the barrier is in the platform, a generated file, a user-supplied source or a third-party service. The response may provide an immediate workaround, request limited diagnostic information, create a correction task or provide a reasonable alternative.

Priority is based on whether the barrier blocks intake, payment, secure access, download or revision; the number of affected users; security; and whether a legal deadline is involved. The platform does not promise a fixed remediation time for every defect, but it will not treat a barrier report as resolved merely because an automated scan passes.

15. No unsupported conformance claim

The service does not state that it is “ADA certified,” because the ADA does not create a general private website certification issued by the Department of Justice. It does not state blanket WCAG 2.1 AA or WCAG 2.2 AA conformance without a documented audit covering the claimed scope.

Individual features may be designed and tested against WCAG success criteria. Any future conformance statement must identify the version, level, pages or workflows tested, date, methodology and known exceptions.

16. State-law and federal-program caveats

State disability, civil-rights, consumer and public-accommodation laws may create obligations or remedies in addition to the ADA. Their coverage differs by jurisdiction and facts. This Statement does not limit a mandatory right or represent that one federal standard displaces state law.

The 2024 DOJ Title II web and mobile rule applies to state and local government entities, not automatically to this private software service. Likewise, Section 508 governs federal-agency ICT and certain federal contexts. If the service is later provided under a government contract or program, additional contractual or statutory accessibility requirements may apply.

17. Changes and ongoing testing

The statement version and update date appear at the top. Accessibility is reviewed when core forms, navigation, pricing, checkout, order status, downloads or revisions change. Desktop and mobile behavior should be tested together. Material known limitations and remediation priorities may be updated without reducing a mandatory legal right.

18. Contact

Accessibility reports and requests for a reasonable alternative should be sent to contact@mylegaldocsai.com. Contractual operator details are available only in the Terms of Service and are not repeated on this page.

Current accessibility and reporting channels

The service supports keyboard focus, responsive layouts, reduced-motion preferences and a dedicated accessibility-barrier process. Automated checks are useful but do not prove that every interaction is accessible; manual review and user reports remain necessary.

  • Use the accessibility contact stated on this page for an accommodation, an inaccessible order step, an alternative format or a barrier requiring a response.
  • Use Help improve the service only for an anonymous general usability observation that does not require an individual response.
  • Do not place case records, payment information or disability documentation in the anonymous feedback form.

Official U.S. Department of Justice guidance explains that businesses serving the public should provide equal access, effective communication and a way to report website accessibility problems. ADA.gov web accessibility guidance.

Describe the barrier, not your entire legal matter.

Provide the affected page, task, browser and assistive technology. Use a secure order identifier for a paid workflow and avoid sending sensitive legal documents by ordinary email.